Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:46:22 +0000
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Mark Hobley schrieb:
I haven't been near Windows in years but it is my impression that NTFS is more reliable that FAT32. Why don't you like it?
I prefer FAT32 over NTFS. Apart from the problem with NTFS being a proprietary filesystem, I have seen some serious problems (on Microsoft Windows based machines), where the filesystem locks everybody out, preventing access to the files, including the Administrator accounts.
Me2 :-(
Often it's sufficient to make an drive accessible in a network, or plug it into a machine, and Windows (XP...) will start to adjust the access rights on that drive. In detail when the drive is r/w, and Windows is told to mount or share it read-only. Such *** will not happen with FAT drives or folders.
I'm only missing easy means (on Linux) to split huge files (>4GB) for storage on a FAT drive. Windows archivers usually offer an option to split an archive into multiple files of a maximum size...
DoDi
GNU tar, and the 'split' command, is built into CygWin.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- References:
- USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Mark Hobley
- Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- From: Hans-Peter Diettrich
- USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Prev by Date: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Next by Date: HPCNCS-09 call for papers
- Previous by thread: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Next by thread: Re: USB external drive help, NTFS, FAT32, EXT3
- Index(es):