swap file vs swap partition
- From: celsius thomas <aarklon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:48:30 +0530
Hi all,
I have read here (http://www.softpanorama.org/Internals/Filesystems/linux_swap_filesystem.shtml )
that swapping to a file is slower than swapping to a partition , based on the following reasons
1) large files(swap file) will be somewhat fragmented forcing additional disk/head movement in some cases and that you will have to deal with metadata describing where on the disk the file blocks are. this eats up both in-system filesystem cache and causes additional disk activity while you load metadata that is not in cache
is there any other reason that justifies this claim OR what exactly is the tradeoff between a swap partition and a swap file ??
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: Manuel Rodriguez
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: MELBIN MATHEW
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: MELBIN MATHEW
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: Doug Freyburger
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: September Storm
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: Keith Keller
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- From: Sidney Lambe
- Re: swap file vs swap partition
- Prev by Date: Re: FC11 recompiling kernel: fail on kernel-firmware dependency
- Next by Date: Re: swap file vs swap partition
- Previous by thread: Download Free Softwares
- Next by thread: Re: swap file vs swap partition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading