Re: Paying developers to get features faster
From: Jan Panteltje (pNaonStpealmtje_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/25/04
- Next message: nix: "Re: X errori in MDK9.2 XFree86 Version 4.3.0 e Ati Rage Fury 32MB"
- Previous message: nix: "Re: X errori in MDK9.2 XFree86 Version 4.3.0 e Ati Rage Fury 32MB"
- In reply to: Ben Theil: "Paying developers to get features faster"
- Next in thread: Ben Measures: "Re: Paying developers to get features faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:36:48 GMT
On a sunny day (Sun, 25 Jan 2004 05:03:21 -0600) it happened Ben Theil
<noname@nowhere.net> wrote in
<Xns947B3F2DCC80Bnonamenowherenet@216.196.97.132>:
I am not sure if I got your idea, but as a business plan your text sucks.
>From an open source point of view no from a technical point of view it
also sucks.
Recently I was asked again for some feature (say program re-write) by
someone -who does never contribute code-, and I told the person in
the most political way to write it himself.
So, there are 4 sure cases where I might have done it if I was payed for it.
It is true that once you have written something you may want to move on to
the next thing, 'for a challenge'.
I write things that I need at some point and that are not available in MS
windows and Linux, sometimes they are available in each but I want it
different etc...
Many people, now that Linux becomes main stream think we programmers work
for them (for free of cause), and send tons of emails with 'feature requests'.
If asked nice in a humble way I add the feature (if it makes sense), but I am
Oh so happy of someone actually finds a bug and or contributes code.
There is also the category of developers who work for some company that has
for example a hardware product, with Linux soft for it, in that case there is
funding.
Features well, companies will try to commercialize Linux of cause, make soft
that you have to pay for, ask them.
Not sure that is really going to work.
Pretty much anything available is as open source, and has more then one
solution from different people.
Still, for a million Euro, I will add the GUI or whatever :-)
>-The Linux programmer only knows how to implement the function but does
>not know the C programming language well. Their knowledge in pointer
>usage, global variable usage, union, types and function parameters is not
>good.
Yea and have you been in commercial companies and looked at THEIR soft?
It is much worse sometimes.
Also I think -at least for some of the programs *I* wrote-, you need several
days of really getting into details before you can even write a single fix,
you needed to be expert on the particular subject too (else you would not
know what was going on). This is true for me fixing something in what I left a
year or more ago.
Someone else doing such a 'rewrite' would make me ask them to bring it out as
their own split off (happened several times already), as then I could not
possibly further develop it.
See, you can have all your knowledge about pointers etc.. now add a feature
to a DVD authoring program.
Such a thing -for example- requires you to know that subject.
Precisely these programs (networking, video, audio, many more subject,
all special tools) are written by experts in that field.
Your chances of breaking it are much greater then fixing it.
JP
- Next message: nix: "Re: X errori in MDK9.2 XFree86 Version 4.3.0 e Ati Rage Fury 32MB"
- Previous message: nix: "Re: X errori in MDK9.2 XFree86 Version 4.3.0 e Ati Rage Fury 32MB"
- In reply to: Ben Theil: "Paying developers to get features faster"
- Next in thread: Ben Measures: "Re: Paying developers to get features faster"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|