Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux
From: Dances With Crows (danSPANceswitTRAPhcrows_at_usa.net)
Date: 02/21/04
- Previous message: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux"
- In reply to: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux"
- Next in thread: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... You guys are selling me on Linux"
- Reply: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... You guys are selling me on Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Feb 2004 00:53:21 GMT
On 20 Feb 2004 12:29:44 -0800, John Campbell staggered into the Black
Sun and said:
> Dances with Crows wrote:
>> "I don't understand what you mean by "download the means of
>> downloading". You can take any machine with Net access, download the
>> Knoppix ISO, then use any CD-burning program to make a Knoppix CD
>> from that ISO. "
> Times have changed. Before I picked up the RH & SuSe CDs -- and for
> that matter as recently as a year ago -- I did not have a CD burner.
> Now I do, and the means of downloading is ... Windows XP. That's an
> option, but it is not really a selling point.
You gotta start somewhere. Remember, very early builds of Linux itself
had to be built under Minix. I used Windows NT to download a Mandrake
ISO back in 1999; would've worked fine if the guy burning the CD hadn't
picked the wrong options while burning the CD. (I got a CD with one
649M file on it called "Mandrake6.iso".)
> Just as part of the current installation was to hand-copy system
> information that I knew only because Windows told me.
Hardware detection/configuration has improved dramatically since the
1999-2000 era your distros came from. X 4.n uses DDC to query the
monitor--no need to enter Hsync and Vsync values, no need to calculate
modelines in most cases. X 3.n didn't do that.
>> "You don't want to write an XF86Config file just using vim."
> No. But I do already have the bulk of one, evidently flawed, that can
> be edited, if I know what I'm looking for. Granted, I don't, and
> that's why I am here.
Post this flawed XF86Config file somewhere on your webspace and include
a URL in your followup. If you don't have a webspace, you can mail it
to me (mind the spamtrap) and I'll see what I can do. It's been forever
since I've looked at an XF86Config from 3.n, but it'll come back to me.
>> "X always writes a log file matching /var/log/XFree86*.log . Look
> I looked. No such file(s).
? Weird. Maybe they changed this between XFree86 3 and 4. I know X
wrote a logfile out even in version 3.3.3.1, but I can't remember the
exact name of the file it wrote and went with the name that X 4.n uses.
> James wrote:
>> "Take a look at /tmp, in particular .X11-unix. and first field for
>> .X11-unix should be like the one above. You may not have a
>> .X11-unix/X0 file, tho."
> Again, no such file. No such directory.
Grr. How annoying.
> Franz wrote::
>> "Maybe you should consider using the tool xf86config (running it as
>> root). ... it's nice compared to vi.."
> Been there, done that, with two different distros. To no avail. A
> tool that consistently produces an unusable file does not strike me as
> nice.
IRA Darth Aggie (IIRC) suggested looking at the pages on file for the
Gateway Solo 2100 for XF86COnfig files. I did that, but the 2 pages
linked from linux-on-laptops.com didn't have this information.
Apparently Redhat 6.1 just brought up X without problems for both the
posters.
> Looks like I am being told that I have the wrong distros for the wrong
> machine. It also looks as if I needed to make this inquiry two failed
> installations ago, as I suspect I've now got Red Hat stuff installed
> on top of SuSe stuff.
Whoa. That isn't good. Try the installation again--I recommend the
Redhat CD, since ISTR Redhat 6.1 was a bit newer than SuSE 6.1.
> Back then, I was attempting a dual-boot installation, and I did not
> have the disk space for the full-bore install-everything options. I
> figured the blame was in skimping on the installation.
Not for this particular problem. There's a lot of stuff you can
install, but the basic X server and a minimal X environment takes ~70M
and should work on most things. To get any real work done, you'll want
a better window manager than the minimal twm, but I found KDE 1 pretty
slow on a Thinkpad 380D (P150, 48M, 2G disk).
> I might have to come back after I've thoroughly wiped this
> installation and started again with one or the other. ... I figure my
> best bet is the Red Hat.
Aye. Move any data you want to save, and have the installer format the
partition--not "format and check", which takes too long.
> I'll also look into Knoppix, which I'd have to mail-order or grab over
> a dial-in.
E-mail your local LUG and ask if anybody has a Knoppix CD. Last LUG
meeting I attended, 3 or 4 people had them, and several machines had
CD-RWs. Hope the Redhat install works this time!
-- Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin / mail: TRAP + SPAN don't belong http://www.brainbench.com / Hire me! -----------------------------/ http://crow202.dyndns.org/~mhgraham/resume
- Previous message: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux"
- In reply to: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux"
- Next in thread: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... You guys are selling me on Linux"
- Reply: John Campbell: "Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... You guys are selling me on Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|