Re: _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect ... Sell me on Linux

From: Dances With Crows (danSPANceswitTRAPhcrows_at_usa.net)
Date: 02/21/04

  • Next message: Chris Babstock: "ctrl-alt-f1 closes X"
    Date: 21 Feb 2004 00:53:21 GMT
    
    

    On 20 Feb 2004 12:29:44 -0800, John Campbell staggered into the Black
    Sun and said:
    > Dances with Crows wrote:
    >> "I don't understand what you mean by "download the means of
    >> downloading". You can take any machine with Net access, download the
    >> Knoppix ISO, then use any CD-burning program to make a Knoppix CD
    >> from that ISO. "
    > Times have changed. Before I picked up the RH & SuSe CDs -- and for
    > that matter as recently as a year ago -- I did not have a CD burner.
    > Now I do, and the means of downloading is ... Windows XP. That's an
    > option, but it is not really a selling point.

    You gotta start somewhere. Remember, very early builds of Linux itself
    had to be built under Minix. I used Windows NT to download a Mandrake
    ISO back in 1999; would've worked fine if the guy burning the CD hadn't
    picked the wrong options while burning the CD. (I got a CD with one
    649M file on it called "Mandrake6.iso".)

    > Just as part of the current installation was to hand-copy system
    > information that I knew only because Windows told me.

    Hardware detection/configuration has improved dramatically since the
    1999-2000 era your distros came from. X 4.n uses DDC to query the
    monitor--no need to enter Hsync and Vsync values, no need to calculate
    modelines in most cases. X 3.n didn't do that.

    >> "You don't want to write an XF86Config file just using vim."
    > No. But I do already have the bulk of one, evidently flawed, that can
    > be edited, if I know what I'm looking for. Granted, I don't, and
    > that's why I am here.

    Post this flawed XF86Config file somewhere on your webspace and include
    a URL in your followup. If you don't have a webspace, you can mail it
    to me (mind the spamtrap) and I'll see what I can do. It's been forever
    since I've looked at an XF86Config from 3.n, but it'll come back to me.

    >> "X always writes a log file matching /var/log/XFree86*.log . Look
    > I looked. No such file(s).

    ? Weird. Maybe they changed this between XFree86 3 and 4. I know X
    wrote a logfile out even in version 3.3.3.1, but I can't remember the
    exact name of the file it wrote and went with the name that X 4.n uses.

    > James wrote:
    >> "Take a look at /tmp, in particular .X11-unix. and first field for
    >> .X11-unix should be like the one above. You may not have a
    >> .X11-unix/X0 file, tho."
    > Again, no such file. No such directory.

    Grr. How annoying.

    > Franz wrote::
    >> "Maybe you should consider using the tool xf86config (running it as
    >> root). ... it's nice compared to vi.."
    > Been there, done that, with two different distros. To no avail. A
    > tool that consistently produces an unusable file does not strike me as
    > nice.

    IRA Darth Aggie (IIRC) suggested looking at the pages on file for the
    Gateway Solo 2100 for XF86COnfig files. I did that, but the 2 pages
    linked from linux-on-laptops.com didn't have this information.
    Apparently Redhat 6.1 just brought up X without problems for both the
    posters.

    > Looks like I am being told that I have the wrong distros for the wrong
    > machine. It also looks as if I needed to make this inquiry two failed
    > installations ago, as I suspect I've now got Red Hat stuff installed
    > on top of SuSe stuff.

    Whoa. That isn't good. Try the installation again--I recommend the
    Redhat CD, since ISTR Redhat 6.1 was a bit newer than SuSE 6.1.

    > Back then, I was attempting a dual-boot installation, and I did not
    > have the disk space for the full-bore install-everything options. I
    > figured the blame was in skimping on the installation.

    Not for this particular problem. There's a lot of stuff you can
    install, but the basic X server and a minimal X environment takes ~70M
    and should work on most things. To get any real work done, you'll want
    a better window manager than the minimal twm, but I found KDE 1 pretty
    slow on a Thinkpad 380D (P150, 48M, 2G disk).

    > I might have to come back after I've thoroughly wiped this
    > installation and started again with one or the other. ... I figure my
    > best bet is the Red Hat.

    Aye. Move any data you want to save, and have the installer format the
    partition--not "format and check", which takes too long.

    > I'll also look into Knoppix, which I'd have to mail-order or grab over
    > a dial-in.

    E-mail your local LUG and ask if anybody has a Knoppix CD. Last LUG
    meeting I attended, 3 or 4 people had them, and several machines had
    CD-RWs. Hope the Redhat install works this time!

    -- 
    Matt G|There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see
    Brainbench MVP for Linux Admin /    mail: TRAP + SPAN don't belong
    http://www.brainbench.com     /                Hire me! 
    -----------------------------/ http://crow202.dyndns.org/~mhgraham/resume
    

  • Next message: Chris Babstock: "ctrl-alt-f1 closes X"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: WSUS Problems
      ... I've tried this but I am still unsure if its picked up the new WSUS server ... Another point is that I understood that the WSUS server does its downloading ... only when it is told to "synchronise" with the Windows Update Site. ... on it, I "approved for installation" all the packages, in an effort to force ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Computer shutdown message, WinXPHomeSP2
      ... The other user gave you a link to a Windows 2000 resource in an XP newsgroup ... this is a new installation, ask your hardware or software manufacturer for ... Beginning dump of physical memory ... There was the usual downloading icon in the system tray; ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: KB946648 Setup Error Message Heard back from McAfee
      ... Downloading the updates coming from Microsoft is always recommend as it brings extra security to your computer aside from the security program you have installed on your computer like McAfee Security Suite. ... MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002 ... >> installation or you repair a Windows XP installation ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • RE: Open Source Supported Graphics Cards
      ... I thought the niche Debian was trying to fill was rock solid ... small part of the battle for a typical Windows user moving to Linux. ... Though if you were read the HTML installation manual, ... They refer to all manner of things of which the casual user ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Fatal Error: Manifest Parse Error...invalid @ the top level of
      ... installation of MS Windows XP Pro from the downloaded ISO image from MS ... I downloaded the XP Pro SP2 ISO, ... Try another burning Software and create a new XP CD by downloading the ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)