Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)
From: Christopher Browne (cbbrowne_at_acm.org)
Date: 02/25/04
- Previous message: Ulf-Rainer Tietz: "Re: Java Path and Gnome"
- Next in thread: Wayne Throop: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Reply: Wayne Throop: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Reply: tom: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 24 Feb 2004 23:52:45 GMT
Oops! Ian Bell <ian@redtommo.com> was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> Its primary performance limiter is the creation of a GUI via the
> x-protocol which is predicated upon the need to provide a network
> transparent graphics system. Remove the need for network
> transparancy and significant performance improvements for desktop
> apps are possible. Work is already going on to do just this.
Have you got any actual benchmarks that demonstrate that the
communications layer _actually_ is the bottleneck?
Or is this simply the usual nonsense about X being bloated because of
"network support?"
Remember: Most of us are using X via UDS, which is NOT "network
transparent," and which eliminates usage of network stack.
If X is slow even when using UDS, then the problem _can't_ simply be
that of the cost of network transparency.
--
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/xbloat.html
"A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything, and the value of
nothing." -- Oscar Wilde
- Previous message: Ulf-Rainer Tietz: "Re: Java Path and Gnome"
- Next in thread: Wayne Throop: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Reply: Wayne Throop: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Reply: tom: "Re: how to get rid of XFree in the longterm (just a thought)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|