Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS
From: Ian Pilcher (i.pilcher_at_comcast.net)
Date: 10/06/04
- Next message: Paul T: "Re: Multiple mice setup?"
- Previous message: Tom Denham: "X Problems - Suddenly stopped working"
- In reply to: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:32:37 GMT
Dances With Crows wrote:
>
> IMO, right-Ctrl is easier to reach than right-Alt. YMMV obviously. I
> don't suppose you've considered using xbindkeys along with xmacroplay to
> bind (right-Alt + key) to an xmacroplay command that sends the
> "Multi_key + char + char" sequence to the X server? That's a roundabout
> way of doing things, but it's a hell of a lot easier to understand than
> XKB.
>
Given that XKB seems to almost completely undocumented (from the point
of view of a user who simply wants to control the behavior of his key-
board), I'd say that just about anything is easier to use.
Unfortunately, neither xbindkeys or xmacroplay is installed on my Fedora
Core 2 system. (And no, I hadn't considered using them, for the reason
that I've never heard of either command before.)
-- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@comcast.net ========================================================================
- Next message: Paul T: "Re: Multiple mice setup?"
- Previous message: Tom Denham: "X Problems - Suddenly stopped working"
- In reply to: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Next in thread: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Reply: Dances With Crows: "Re: US int'l layout WITHOUT DEAD KEYS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|