Which Samba is more stable?
From: Robin Hood (suseelsc_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/28/03
- Next message: Bogdan: "Modem Question, Please Help :("
- Previous message: Digi: "wearable 486 desktop"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Which Samba is more stable?"
- Reply: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Which Samba is more stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Sep 2003 12:03:20 -0700
Which one do you think is the more stable version of samba? Is it
2.2.3a-6 or the one which comes under RH9?
Do you think there are any holes in the latest samba 3.0?
If there are any security holes in 2.2.3a-6, then what are they?
- Next message: Bogdan: "Modem Question, Please Help :("
- Previous message: Digi: "wearable 486 desktop"
- Next in thread: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Which Samba is more stable?"
- Reply: Jeroen Geilman: "Re: Which Samba is more stable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
