Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts
From: R.F. Pels (spamtrap_at_tiscali.nl)
Date: 03/29/04
- Next message: Ken Williams: "Linux 2.4.x on Poweredge 1750 or HP DL360?"
- Previous message: Hans Kuder: "saving files with Ted"
- In reply to: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Next in thread: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Reply: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 03:00:52 +0200
natG wrote:
> Samba was designed for Windows shares and therefore carries
> Windows/netbios baggage (performance wise) with it.
Heh. My experience tells me that Samba is quite some quicker as a Windows
server sharing volumes through the same method. Definitely feels snappier.
> Do folks actually use Samba for Linux-only networks? One of the Linux
> hosts is also a J2EE server, and I don't want it to incure extra Samba
> overhead memory/cpu unless absolutely required.
Yes you do. One, the overhead isn't that much, two, you can share disk space
over SMB while at the same time sharing it via NFS.
-- Ruurd .o. ..o ooo
- Next message: Ken Williams: "Linux 2.4.x on Poweredge 1750 or HP DL360?"
- Previous message: Hans Kuder: "saving files with Ted"
- In reply to: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Next in thread: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Reply: natG: "Re: Windows NFS client to access Linux (Fedora & Suse) hosts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]