Re: Partition table is inconsistent
From: Gerard Wassink (DontWant_at_SP_aM.nl)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: sekoia: "Re: Partition table is inconsistent"
- Previous message: Pama: "Partition table is inconsistent"
- In reply to: Pama: "Partition table is inconsistent"
- Next in thread: sekoia: "Re: Partition table is inconsistent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:56:11 +0200
On 15 Jul 2004 02:11:43 -0700, Pama wrote:
> Hello,
[snip]
> "The partition table is inconsistent. There are many reasons why this
> might be the case. Often, the reason is that Linux detected the BIOS
> geometry incorrectly. However, this does not appear to be the case
> here. It is safe to ignore, but ignoring may cause (fixable) problems
> with some boot loaders, and may cause problems with FAT file systems.
> Using LBA is recommended."
>
[snip]
I've seen this message in my own installs and did what it stated: ignore
it. (it only *could* cause *fixable* problems!
Never had any here...
HTH
-- There's no place like 127.0.0.1 Gerard Wassink http://linux.family.filternet.nl Linux counter #360967, "In a world without fences, who needs gates?"
- Next message: sekoia: "Re: Partition table is inconsistent"
- Previous message: Pama: "Partition table is inconsistent"
- In reply to: Pama: "Partition table is inconsistent"
- Next in thread: sekoia: "Re: Partition table is inconsistent"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|