Sata v SCSI
From: Mike Keithley (mkeithley_at_pobox.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: maui: "Re: Halle Berry naked"
- Previous message: fadumptpenguin: "Re: Halle Berry naked"
- Next in thread: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Reply: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Reply: Allan Wind: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 02:19:33 GMT
Hello group:
I'm doing research to bun a new computer. It's essentially a workstation
but the faster the drives the better! It will be running Windows (XP) and
Linux (2.4.26/Slackware) on separate hard drives.
Questions: How does SATA perform compared
to SCSI? Will there be more compatibility problems with SATA then with
SCSI? If SCSI is better, where do I find motherboards with on-board SCSI
controllers?
Thanks
- Next message: maui: "Re: Halle Berry naked"
- Previous message: fadumptpenguin: "Re: Halle Berry naked"
- Next in thread: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Reply: Sybren Stuvel: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Reply: Allan Wind: "Re: Sata v SCSI"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|