USB support,; is it still work in progress?
From: Robicd (robicd_at_gmx.net)
Date: 03/21/05
- Next message: KT: "Re: Partitioning in Linux"
- Previous message: KT: "Re: Active Directory Log on"
- Next in thread: Robicd: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Robicd: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Lenard: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Shadow_7: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 21 Mar 2005 09:05:11 -0800
Just a quick question: is Linux USB code still actively maintained?
I'm a little confused. USB Linux docs around seem to be very old and
outdated (e.g. www.linux-usb.org).
It seems to me that there is something in the kernel (2.6 makes use of
Linus' USB code, right?) but there is much more in the wild (very many
USB peripherals modules which generally don't collaborate with each
other; see the various webcam modules around).
I am a very fan of Linux, I'm switching back to Linux after a long time
spent with MS, but I don't like this scenario. Is there something I am
missing?
Robi
- Next message: KT: "Re: Partitioning in Linux"
- Previous message: KT: "Re: Active Directory Log on"
- Next in thread: Robicd: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Robicd: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Lenard: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Reply: Shadow_7: "Re: USB support,; is it still work in progress?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]