Re: Linux : Which one's best ?
From: chris (chrisehunter_at_NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 07/26/05
- Next message: Nigel Robinson: "linux to windows file transfer"
- Previous message: philo: "Re: Linux : Which one's best ?"
- In reply to: philo: "Re: Linux : Which one's best ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:50:08 GMT
philo wrote:
>
> "OICU812" <nulladdress237@qwest.net> wrote in message
> news:MCOEe.19$1i6.5943@news.uswest.net...
>> Any / all opinions wanted.
>>
>> Particularly in the business world...... who's on top ?
>
>
> don't know what's best for you...
> but Red Hat is pretty much the "big one".
Most of the /business/ installs I've done have used Suse. I've not had any
complaints about it. Migration from MS brokenware was painless, and
surprisingly little customer training was needed. Suse makes a good job of
network installs, has the usual "Office" applications well configured, has
a sensibly organised security policy and is easy to maintain.
Chris
-- Everything gets easier with practice, except getting up in the morning!
- Next message: Nigel Robinson: "linux to windows file transfer"
- Previous message: philo: "Re: Linux : Which one's best ?"
- In reply to: philo: "Re: Linux : Which one's best ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
