Re: Linux vs MS Security

From: Tobias Brox (tobias_at_stud.cs.uit.no)
Date: 08/25/05


Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:50:00 +0000 (UTC)


[Ivan Marsh]
>> 1 (SPAM) What percentage of SPAM is transmitted by compromised Linux
>> systems compared to Microsoft?

> < .5% (high estimate) - the only way I can imagine a Linux box being
> zombied to be a spam server is if the admin manually downloads and
> installs a compromised piece of software.

Well. A linux box not beeing maintained or upgraded, or badly
installed in the first place, is very likely to get compromised. I
know there exists boxes that have been connected to the net for years
and years without any maintainance or upgrades beeing performed -
sysadmins eventually throwing up a firewall to hide the problem.

For one thing it is not so many years ago when most of the mail server
software by default was set up as open relays. It was also common to
have linux distributions where lots and lots of servers was set up by
default. It used to be normal to let servers run as root. Security
flaws have always existed, notoriously buffer-overflows. Thus, having
a linux box with servers running on Internet without patching up the
software every now and then is a quite risky affair, if a skilled
person gains root access to the box and starts installing back doors,
trojans, etc, then it will be extremely difficult to "clean up" the
system. Of course, this applies to windows as well.

> You will not have your Linux box
> taken over by browsing a web page as you can in Windows.

Of course, a regular linux user would not run his browser as "root",
thus the box won't be taken over no matter how many holes there are in
the browser. Some Microsofties I'm regularly discussing security
with, would claim that the same applies to windows. When people are
running all their applications as "System Administrator" on their
windows boxes, it is (according to said Microsofties) due to
ignorance; everybody should learn a bit about computing before using
or owning a computer. Well, I tend to disagree, surfing the web
should be reasonably safe for anyone, and it should be possible for
Microsoft to deliver a virtually maintainance-free product, or
eventually, for dealers to do support/maintainance for dummies.

That beeing said, of course I feel miles safer running Mozilla than
MSIE, both because I expect Mozilla to be safer and because it is less
targeted.

-- 
This signature has been virus scanned, and is probably safe to read
Tobias Brox, 69°42'N, 18°57'E


Relevant Pages

  • RE: Boot device error 0x0000007B+0xf789e63c
    ... says that main problem with booting servers from SANs is ... > Blue Screen Preparation Before Contacting Microsoft ... > Windows NT ... > the Selective Startup button. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
    ... Also there are other mentions of Windows Servers replacing UNIX servers. ... Because the people speaking don't code and the vendor probably said so. ... computers were replaced by Dell computers using Microsoft software. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Cannot add users from trusted domain
    ... Windows 2003 domain to any folders. ... on these servers, but we cannot add any new ones. ... Were you able to add the Windows 2003 AD Domain Admins tothe NT4 ... This is a direct link to the Microsoft Public ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Microsoft Censorship PROVES it is a Corporate Scumbag!
    ... The above post was pulled from MS's Servers. ... EVERY time someone needs telephone activation it costs Microsoft for overseas phone charges and labor costs. ... They are bound to incorporate a few more ideas in each version of Windows that were previously available in Linux and Macintosh operating systems though. ... There's a good probability your parents, grandparents or neighbors own a little bit of Microsoft through a mutual fund. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: File Deletion Problems
    ... Does this issue only occur on the computers that are running Windows XP ... other servers? ... > Microsoft Online Support Engineer ... >>The user deleteing the file has the correct permissions to the files and ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)