Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?
From: Alex Butcher (alex.butcher.news1005_at_assursys.co.uk)
Date: 11/26/05
- Next message: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Previous message: SINNER: "Re: roadrunner and linux"
- In reply to: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Next in thread: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Reply: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:15:52 +0000
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:08:03 +0000, Mark Hobley wrote:
> In alt.comp.linux Alex Butcher <alex.butcher.news1005@assursys.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> ...and that is why I recommend just running 'fdisk -l' on the device,
>> instead.
>
> LS120s don't by default have a partition table, so this doesn't work by
> default.
Have you tried it? I'm pretty sure it will, since presumably your LS120
drive appears as a standard block device. See, I can even run it on a
standard MS-DOS formatted floppy (which also doesn't have a partition
table):
# fdisk -l /dev/fd0
Disk /dev/fd0: 1 MB, 1474560 bytes
2 heads, 18 sectors/track, 80 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 36 * 512 = 18432 bytes
[snip errors resulting from the first few blocks not being a valid MBR and
partition table]
> Mark.
Best Regards,
Alex.
-- Alex Butcher Brainbench MVP for Internet Security: www.brainbench.com Bristol, UK Need reliable and secure network systems? PGP/GnuPG ID:0x271fd950 <http://www.assursys.com/>
- Next message: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Previous message: SINNER: "Re: roadrunner and linux"
- In reply to: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Next in thread: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Reply: Mark Hobley: "Re: LS120 Capacity - Is 122880 the correct capacity for Tar Backup ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|