Re: do I need initrd.img in my case ?
From: €®ik (et57__DELETE__THIS___at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/17/03
- Next message: Rene: "Invalid mount point"
- Previous message: BRH: "Re: Upgrade to Mozilla 1.4 on Redhat Linux 9"
- In reply to: Lenard: "Re: do I need initrd.img in my case ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:19:12 +0200
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:15:37 GMT, the right honourable Lenard
<lenard@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:32:59 +0200, €®ik typed:
>
>> "kernel= /bzImage-2.4.22 ro root=LABEL=/"
>
>Try;
>kernel= /bzImage-2.4.22 ro root=/dev/sda2 nomodules
>
>http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/custom-guide/s1-custom-kernel-monolithic.html
>
>Just out of curiosity do you have a /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22 file ?
no, i called it bzImage-2.4.22
???
you're a lot of help. thnx :-)
frgr
Erik
- Next message: Rene: "Invalid mount point"
- Previous message: BRH: "Re: Upgrade to Mozilla 1.4 on Redhat Linux 9"
- In reply to: Lenard: "Re: do I need initrd.img in my case ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
