Re: mount error anomoly
From: Vwakes (vwakeNOSPAM100_at_softhome.net)
Date: 10/23/03
- Next message: Stephane Marchand: "Linux Installation (USB, USB Device)"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Please Define *Troll*"
- In reply to: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Next in thread: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Reply: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:57:26 -0700
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 Haines Brown wrote:
>Vwakes <vwakeNOSPAM100@softhome.net> writes:
>
>> > mount: Wrong fs type, bad options, bad superblock on /dev/sda10,
>> > or too many mounted file systems.
>>
>> Let us know abt the relevant line in your /etc/fstab. Coz the above
>> way takes parms from the /etc/fstab. Since you have verified all
>> other possibilities it could be the "options" in fstab thats the
>> problem here.
>
>/dev/sda10 /mnt/sda10 reiserfs defaults,noauto,owner 0 0
Maybe the option 'noauto' is contradicting the option 'defaults'. Man
says,
defaults
Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec, auto, nouser, and async.
V.
- Next message: Stephane Marchand: "Linux Installation (USB, USB Device)"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Silverman: "Re: Please Define *Troll*"
- In reply to: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Next in thread: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Reply: Haines Brown: "Re: mount error anomoly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]