Re: Linux fedora core 4 ... GRUB loading stage2... booting message

someone92_at_hotmail.com
Date: 11/17/05

  • Next message: Nobody Here: "Re: Linux fedora core 4 ... GRUB loading stage2... booting message"
    Date: 16 Nov 2005 23:42:30 -0800
    
    

    Lenard wrote:
    > Was this a clean install (wipe and load) or did you do an upgrade??

    yes it was a clean install, I know it was a stupid idea to keep the
    boot sector file but it worked for a while.

    by the way I just tried to ghost the boot partition today and I receive
    an error, maybe it as something to do with the fact that everything was
    working correctly an sudently stoped working.

    here's the original message:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I'm trying to ghost my ext3 linux fedora core 4 boot partition using
    ghost (2003 I think) and I receive this error:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-----------------------------------------------------

    Error Number: (29004)
    Message: Read sector failure, result = 1, drive = 0, sectors -340954973

    to -340954971
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­-----------------------------------------------------

    (If you think that sending the complete error log file would help let
    me know and I'll post it)

    My root partition can be ghosted without problems by the way. And I was

    able to ghost the boot partition not long ago.

    I have scanned the partion's surface using ranish partition manager
    with a negative result, no bad sectors were found.

    the I thought it was a bad blocks problem so I used linux's:
    e2fsck -c /dev/hdb6

    with this result:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---------------------

    WARNING!!! Running e2fsck on a mounted filesystem may cause
    SEVERE filesystem damage.

    Do you really want to continue (y/n)? yes

    /boot: recovering journal
    Checking for bad blocks (read-only test): done
    388
    Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
    Pass 2: Checking directory structure
    Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
    Pass 4: Checking reference counts
    Pass 5: Checking group summary information

    /boot: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
    /boot: 40/26104 files (22.5% non-contiguous), 16184/104388 blocks
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­----------------------

    I choose to scan the drive even if it was mounted because I was so
    desperate, was it a bad idea?

    To me this seems like there were no error found, I'm I right?

    so I ran ghost again and received the same error. What is the problem
    if there's no bad sectors or bad blocks (or they were fixed). What's
    the difference between bad blocks and bad sectors by the way?

    One thing I think is strange is the numbers of the sectors (-340954973
    to -340954971). Isn't it unusual?

    Do you have any suggestions or scanning tools you think I should use to

    scan the drive? I tried western digital's HD test utility but it
    crashes the system. Maybe because I have 2 other WD drives mounted in a

    RAID0 array or the version is too old. Anyway any idea or hints will be

    welcome

    Thanks in advance

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: Nobody Here: "Re: Linux fedora core 4 ... GRUB loading stage2... booting message"

    Relevant Pages

    • problem ghosting a fedora boot partition (error 29004 - Read sector failure ...)
      ... I'm trying to ghost my ext3 linux fedora core 4 boot partition using ... if there's no bad sectors or bad blocks. ... Maybe because I have 2 other WD drives mounted in a ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Re: Pointsec PC and Ghost
      ... >I have a laptop with PointSec PC installed on it, ... Ghost works most easily when backing up a full drive rather than ... just a boot partition (although just the boot partition CAN be ... the backup media as the original drive (since encryption doesn't ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: Transferring Windows OS from IDE to SCSI
      ... > Using Ghost 2003, you can clone across non-identical volumes. ... > just yesterday I used it to clone a 8 gb boot partition to a 20 gb boot ... SCSI controllers ain't cheap at retail, ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
    • Re: How to bypass XP install checking for prior existing version
      ... When Ghost starts ... >Command Line using a boot disk. ... >>I have bad sectors on my hard drive right where the XP ... >>it encounters the bad sectors in the directory. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Recommendation / advice needed
      ... >> Just make sure the target partition is exactly the same size as the ... >> source partition; otherwise, Ghost will bomb. ... >>> bad sectors, you are basically copying the bad sectors if the ... >>> Must be systemworks pro, ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)