Re: FC1 vs FC2
From: Michael (Michael-nospam_at_bigpond.net.au)
Date: 06/23/04
- Previous message: Noi: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Next in thread: Michael: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Reply: Michael: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Reply: Pip: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:53:28 GMT
In <40d8cd6c$0$3035$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> Mark wrote:
> Mark J. Nenadov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:00:24 +0000, Michael wrote:
>>
>>> Are there major differences between FC1 and FC2
>>>
>>> are rpms compatable?
>>>
>>> I want to install the latest version of wine on a FC2 computer but the
>>> rpms are only built for FC1.
>>
>> The RPMS should be compatible. From what I understand, FC2 is
>> just a bit more "bleeding edge" than FC1.
>>
>> --
>> Mark J. Nenadov
>> Python Byte Solutions
>> http://www.pythonbyte.com/
>
> The big difference is FC2 uses the next kernel 2.6.X and
> FC1 still used 2.4.X
> Mark
OK - I recall that is why I went to FD2 from RH9. Because kernel 2.6 has
ALSA built in (but I still didn't get my sound card to work even though it
is now recognised)
I tried installing the latest wine FC1 rpm on the FC2 machine. It installed
OK but segfaulted when I ran it.
If anyone knoes where I can get a wine rpm for FC2 please post the location.
I have asked in the wine newsgroup and searched the web (to the extent I
can) but have had no luck.
The only one I found was at
http://newrpms.sunsite.dk/apt/redhat/en/i386/fc2/RPMS.newrpms/
which said it was wine-20040505 but actually installed 20040408 and would
let me select drives during office install.
- Previous message: Noi: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- In reply to: Mark: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Next in thread: Michael: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Reply: Michael: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Reply: Pip: "Re: FC1 vs FC2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
