Re: Redhat Future?
From: Ken Prox (kprox_at_wwnet.net)
Date: 10/18/03
- Next message: RodgerH: "Re: RH AS2.1 under GPL?"
- Previous message: samkupar: "Re: What do I do with tar.bz2"
- In reply to: Nils O. Selåsdal: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Next in thread: Kingbarry2000: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Reply: Kingbarry2000: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 17:08:33 GMT
Nils O. Selåsdal wrote:
> In article <MPG.19f9df94e437dcf398973e@news-lhr.cableinet.net>, sniler wrote:
>
>>In article <vov6mrh43rm9e5@corp.supernews.com>, nospam@nosite.zzz says...
>>
>>>Robert M. Riches Jr wrote:
>>>
>>>< snip >
>>>
>>>>There will be a Fedora, but it will be less stable and less
>>>>reliable than the RHL we are used to.
>>>
>>>On what evidence do you base this? The old RH represented the result of a
>>>bunch of people trying to create a reasonably reliable Liux distribution.
>>>Until evidence proves otherwise, so will Fedora's version.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Paul Lutus
>>>http://www.arachnoid.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>The evidence is they have already said they are going to be releasing
>>buggier versions and frequently -
>>
>>that aint no way to run a ballroom.
>
> Who said that ? When ? No redhat people have said that afaik.
>
That's a given for any public company, who's #1 customer is the
stockholders.
-- Ken e-mail mailto:DkEpLrEoTxE@wwnet.net (Delete caps to reply) url http://wwnet.net/~kprox pgp http://www.keyserver.net
- Next message: RodgerH: "Re: RH AS2.1 under GPL?"
- Previous message: samkupar: "Re: What do I do with tar.bz2"
- In reply to: Nils O. Selåsdal: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Next in thread: Kingbarry2000: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Reply: Kingbarry2000: "Re: Redhat Future?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
