Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?
From: Rich Webb (bbew.ar_at_mapson.nozirev.ten)
Date: 10/21/03
- Next message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Previous message: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java and RedHat 9.0"
- In reply to: Paul Lutus: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Next in thread: Steve Schreiber: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 02:55:29 GMT
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:47:46 -0700, Paul Lutus <nospam@nosite.zzz>
wrote:
>Steve Schreiber <sschreibATmagma.ca> wrote:
>
>< snip >
>
>> To continue on this part, you can sell a Linux distribution, you can
>> sell just a Linux kernel (as per GPL),
>
>Not THE Linux kernel, per se. It's not for sale.
Or rather, one can sell it but cannot prevent others from offering the
same thing for free.
-- Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
- Next message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Previous message: Paul Lutus: "Re: Java and RedHat 9.0"
- In reply to: Paul Lutus: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Next in thread: Steve Schreiber: "Re: what does it mean now that Redhat has gone commerical?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
