Re: Newbie needs help...

From: Brandon (maccorin_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 11/13/03

  • Next message: Ed: "Re: Fedora Review from current users..."
    Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:15:13 GMT
    
    

    On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:08:58 -0800, Jim wrote:

    > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 05:07:41 +0000, Brandon wrote:
    >
    >> On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:54:54 -0800, Jim wrote:
    >>
    >> snip...snip
    >>
    >>> Try a different video card, an older one. Go into the display
    >>> properties for RH and set everything to generic...generic video generic
    >>> monitor....and then switch back to your Radeon card. Let us know if
    >>> that works.
    >>
    >> you don't need to do this, you can download radeon drivers for linux. go
    >> to http://www.ati.com/support/faq/linux.html for information straight
    >> from ATI
    >
    > As a new user i recommend AGAINST attempting to download any drivers in
    > the convoluted confusing and frustrating world of linux. ATI may be
    > different then nVidia but I suspect they are modeled alike.
    >
    > In the nVidia camp you have to start without the x window system running
    > and then when you execute the installer it actually wants the header files
    > for parts of the OS, which means it is going to try to compile something
    > on your machine.

    as root:
    init 3; sh ./NVIDIA-Linux-rest-of-file-name.sh;
    thats is to hard?
    (the compilation is done automatically if needed)
     
    > This is a sacralidge in the computer world. No users should be compiling
    > portions of the OS just to get a driver installed.

    I guess the user *should* have to own more then one video card,
    and switch then in and out? sounds harder then 2 commands to me :\

    > So, unless you are vet and you understand exactly what is going on and are
    > willing to put up with the potential to recompile parts of your OS to get
    > a driver installed then follow his advice.

    He's right, much easier just to work extra hours to get the extra
    money to buy another more *generic* video card that won't work as
    well...

    > I would recommend the path of least resistence. Swap a video card for and
    > older one (if you have it) and see if x windows works. Then review and
    > select your current video card from the list PROVIDED by RH. Then
    > reinsert your old card.

    I don't know about ATI drivers provided by RH, but the NV driver they
    provide is not hardware accelerated... Boy I love playing quake at 12 fps

    /* start rant */
    sorry for the sarcasm, but how is a "newbie" ever going to learn if
    they don't actually get the computer to work for them (ie... with the
    hardware they want) instead of them working for the computer (ie...
    with the hardware that has good default setups)
    /* end rant */


  • Next message: Ed: "Re: Fedora Review from current users..."

    Relevant Pages

    • ATI DRIVERS
      ... Ati Video Drivers ... Ati Radeon 9200 Drivers ... Ati Rage 128 Pro Drivers ...
      (comp.programming)
    • ATI DRIVERS
      ... Ati Video Drivers ... Free Ati Radeon Display Drivers ... Compaq Presario Video Drivers Ati ...
      (sci.data.formats)
    • Re: PCIE video cards and DRI
      ... >Nvidia and ATI closed source drivers when used with PCI-Express ... I have set up a number of Linux boxes with Nvidia and ATI ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Opinion: NVIDIA drivers are a BAD Thing [tm]
      ... >> source drivers, we are pretty much stuck with the situation. ... > the community and trying to push X and Linux integration forward. ... ATI has not changed. ... > the right to either make the chip themselves or to sell the card ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: ati-driver petition
      ... > drivers and to provide 64bit drivers. ... Linux, but if they're not as good as those for Windows, they have a reason: ... Windows is their main cash cow, ... There are plenty of ATI drivers that work fine. ...
      (alt.os.linux)