Re: (Newb) No Subnet declaration for start (0.0.0.0)
From: YR_A (alex.fam3_at_verizon.net)
Date: 11/30/03
- Next message: Keith Clark: ""Gnome" screensavers in KDE?"
- Previous message: Don Hickey: "Re: Newbie question about installing Java plugin for Mozilla"
- In reply to: YR_A: "Re: (Newb) No Subnet declaration for start (0.0.0.0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:13:45 GMT
YR_A wrote:
> Tommy Reynolds wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:21:28 +0000, YR_A wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No subnet declaration for start (0.0.0.0).
>>> ** Ignoring requests on start. If this is not what
>>> you want, please write a subnet declaration
>>> in your dhcpd.conf file for the network segment
>>> to which interface start is attached. **
>>
>>
>>
>> Your eth0 needs an IP address assigned before dhcpd gets started.
>> Send us the output of:
>>
>> # ifconfig
>>
>> so we can check.
>>
>
> Well here it is, I know that I am probably overlooking something minute
> I,m hoping that you can assist me in uncovering it... TIA...
>
>
> [yves@dc-afam-2 yves]$ cd /sbin
> [yves@dc-afam-2 sbin]$ ./ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr ##:##:##:##:##:##
> inet addr:10.7.5.3 Bcast:10.7.5.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:284 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:346 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:37708 (36.8 Kb) TX bytes:29192 (28.5 Kb)
> Interrupt:9 Base address:0x9000
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:9320 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:9320 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:635302 (620.4 Kb) TX bytes:635302 (620.4 Kb)
>
> [yves@dc-afam-2 sbin]$
>
More over, took a peek at the "dhcpd.leases" log file which displayed
the following inspite of the "No subnet declaration for start
(0.0.0.0)." error:
# All times in this file are in UTC (GMT), not your local timezone.
This is
# not a bug, so please don't ask about it. There is no portable way to
# store leases in the local timezone, so please don't request this as a
# feature. If this is inconvenient or confusing to you, we sincerely
# apologize. Seriously, though - don't ask.
# The format of this file is documented in the dhcpd.leases(5) manual page.
# This lease file was written by isc-dhcp-V3.0pl1
lease 10.7.5.10 {
starts 1 2003/11/24 02:37:22;
ends 2 2003/12/02 02:37:22;
tstp 2 2003/12/02 02:37:22;
binding state active;
next binding state free;
hardware ethernet ##:##:##:##:##:##;
uid "\001\000\000\206<\211\020";
client-hostname "client-3";
}
lease 10.7.5.100 {
starts 1 2003/11/24 16:37:40;
ends 2 2003/12/02 16:37:40;
tstp 2 2003/12/02 16:37:40;
binding state active;
next binding state free;
hardware ethernet ##:##:##:##:##:##;
uid "\001\000@\0059D\303";
client-hostname "Tina";
}
Please tell me where I may be going wrong.. TIA..
- Next message: Keith Clark: ""Gnome" screensavers in KDE?"
- Previous message: Don Hickey: "Re: Newbie question about installing Java plugin for Mozilla"
- In reply to: YR_A: "Re: (Newb) No Subnet declaration for start (0.0.0.0)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
