RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9
From: Mike (mikerocks65_at_)
Date: 12/12/03
- Previous message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Survey of RH EOL small business users/consultants"
- Next in thread: wb: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: wb: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Jason Bowen: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Rob: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:57:45 -0500
With the RH line end of life at hand I am looking the RH Enterprise line.
How does RH Enterprise WS compare to something like Redhat 9.0? Is it
essentially the same thing or are there features missing?
I am simply looking for a replacement for RH 9.0 as an apache, dns or
database application server. For a small business I do not see the benefit
of going with the other versions. I am thinking even Fedora might due.
Opinions pls?
- Previous message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Survey of RH EOL small business users/consultants"
- Next in thread: wb: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: wb: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Jason Bowen: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Rob: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|