Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9
From: wb (dead_email_at_nospam.com)
Date: 12/12/03
- Next message: steve harris: "Re: folder size"
- Previous message: Andrew: "folder size"
- In reply to: Mike: "RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Mike: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 02:32:09 GMT
See :
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/features/
Mike wrote:
> With the RH line end of life at hand I am looking the RH Enterprise line.
> How does RH Enterprise WS compare to something like Redhat 9.0? Is it
> essentially the same thing or are there features missing?
>
> I am simply looking for a replacement for RH 9.0 as an apache, dns or
> database application server. For a small business I do not see the benefit
> of going with the other versions. I am thinking even Fedora might due.
>
> Opinions pls?
>
>
>
- Next message: steve harris: "Re: folder size"
- Previous message: Andrew: "folder size"
- In reply to: Mike: "RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Reply: Mike: "Re: RH Enterprise WS compared to RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
