Re: Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?
From: steve harris (steveharris1_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: Sean Lebeau: "Re: newbie - fedora - adsl not working"
- Previous message: zod: "Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- In reply to: zod: "Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:36:43 -0600
zod wrote:
> Question: If Redhat9 is the last distro is it possible to update the kernel
> aftwards?
>
>
>
>
Fedora (RH10) is free which takes over for RH9.
http://fedora.redhat.com/
But yes, you can update the kernel without RH doing it for you.
www.linuxhq.com
Steve
- Next message: Sean Lebeau: "Re: newbie - fedora - adsl not working"
- Previous message: zod: "Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- In reply to: zod: "Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- Next in thread: Richard Steven Hack: "Re: Question: If Redhat9 is the last free distro is it possible to update the kernel aftwards?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
