Re: NIC pronlem with Rdhat 9.
From: Allen McIntosh (mcintosh_at_nospam.com)
Date: 01/24/04
- Next message: Lenard: "Re: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer"
- Previous message: hutuworm: "Re: mounting loopback-devices"
- In reply to: Leigh Bowden: "NIC pronlem with Rdhat 9."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:42:35 GMT
In article <burshm$ua5$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>,
Leigh Bowden <LGBowden@bowdenfamily.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>Network is
>reported as Intel PRO/100 VM Network Connection by Win 98 device manager.
So /etc/modules.conf should contain something like
alias eth0 e100
>Originally system booted with problems on the ETH0 device
What were they?
> and whinged about
>iptables and rules etc and FAILED. This seemed to be part of the firewall so
>I've turned all that off and iptables services are off. Boot now showsdevice
>as OK.
>
>Lots of problems with the network interface and shows as inactive with
>redhat-network-config program. Try to activate but doesn't do anything. I
>can't tell if samba is working until this is sorted - I think? I've hunted
>around for config files for eth0 but all those say it will start at boot.
>Ifconfig implies the card is running at HALF DUPLEX would this cause a
>problem?
I'm not sure how you got that information out of ifconfig.
Is the windows box running at 10 or 100 Mbits/sec? Half duplex
would be expected for 10, but not for 100.
"My network card doesn't work" comes up a lot in this and related
newsgroups. Google is your friend.
- Next message: Lenard: "Re: [Errno 104] Connection reset by peer"
- Previous message: hutuworm: "Re: mounting loopback-devices"
- In reply to: Leigh Bowden: "NIC pronlem with Rdhat 9."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|