Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?
From: Edward Alfert (ealfert_at_rootmode.com)
Date: 02/14/04
- Next message: Trog Woolley: "Re: No Rumor: Windows Source Code Loose on the 'Net"
- Previous message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- In reply to: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Next in thread: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Reply: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 Feb 2004 19:32:29 GMT
Steve Schreiber <sschreibATTmagmaDOTTca> wrote in
news:ncydnRO9s7ef7LPdRVn-vA@magma.ca:
> I noticed the error you posted in your first email:
>
> Feb 14 12:11:02 blue kernel: Device 08:30 not ready.
> Feb 14 12:11:02 blue kernel: I/O error: dev 08:30, sector 0
>
>
> I am not certain (maybe someone could verify) if this is the maj/min
> number this error is refering to 8:30, on my system, 8,30 is sdb14.
>
>
> brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 30 Jan 30 2003 sdb14
>
>
> Your :
> 8 48 143666192 sdd 7 21 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
> line matches up to my device files. Is there anyway your devices files
> are mucked up? Unless someone can verify that is what the error is,
> this may not be of much help... but you can take a look at it and
> maybe determine for yourself.
>
I'm not sure what all that means, but here is a dump of relevant files
in /dev. Maybe they will mean something to you. I will in the mean
time search the internet for the keywords "maj" "min" "scsi" and see
what I come up with. I have no knowledge on this topic.
[root@blue dev]# ls -al | grep sd | grep 8 | grep 30
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 30 Apr 11 2002 sdb14
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 68, 30 Apr 11 2002 sdbn14
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 68, 130 Apr 11 2002 sdbu2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 68, 230 Apr 11 2002 sdca6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 130 Apr 11 2002 sdi2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 230 Apr 11 2002 sdo6
[root@blue dev]# ls -al | grep sdd
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 48 Apr 11 2002 sdd
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 49 Apr 11 2002 sdd1
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 58 Apr 11 2002 sdd10
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 59 Apr 11 2002 sdd11
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 60 Apr 11 2002 sdd12
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 61 Apr 11 2002 sdd13
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 62 Apr 11 2002 sdd14
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 63 Apr 11 2002 sdd15
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 50 Apr 11 2002 sdd2
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 51 Apr 11 2002 sdd3
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 52 Apr 11 2002 sdd4
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 53 Apr 11 2002 sdd5
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 54 Apr 11 2002 sdd6
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 55 Apr 11 2002 sdd7
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 56 Apr 11 2002 sdd8
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 8, 57 Apr 11 2002 sdd9
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 70, 128 Apr 11 2002 sdda
<snip> It keeps going for many more lines until the last line which
follows: <snip>
brw-rw---- 1 root disk 71, 249 Apr 11 2002 sddx9
> To zero a disk with `dd` issue: `dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/<device>
> bs=512 count=(x)` <device> in your case would be /dev/sdd, and (x) is
> pretty much whatever you want...
I just tried your suggestion and I still cannot fdisk. Following is the
result:
[root@blue root]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdd bs=512 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
[root@blue root]# fdisk /dev/sdd
Unable to read /dev/sdd
> As for putting in a disklabel, I am not
> certain how to do it on Linux. fdisk should have (?) a 'default'
> disklabel it can put to the disk. Some Unix equivs. have problems
> with disk with no disklabeling on them, so have this feature (although
> I would assume that Linux would not have these problems since it is
> not brain-damaged as most propriatary Unix flavours). Something else
> to look at.
When I do an fdisk -l it does not list the Maxtor drive, but it does
list the new Fujitsu (which I still have not formatted or partitioned).
[root@blue root]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda2 14 78 522112+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda3 79 8924 71055495 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/sdb: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8924 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 1 13 104391 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb2 14 78 522112+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sdb3 79 8924 71055495 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/sdc: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 8936 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
> The only other problem I have had with SCSI drives that really
> screwed me up was the Adaptec built-in low level format tool. I
> canceled out of it once about half way though (an hour in) and I
> couldn't do anything with the disk until I went through the whole
> process again-but letting it finish! I don't suppose you formatted it
> with this tool did you?
I have not gone into any scsi utilities and messed with the drives. So
I do not believe this is the cause.
Thanks for all your help so far. I'm learning.
-- Edward Alfert - http://www.rootmode.com/ Coupon Code (Recurring $5/month Discount): newsgroup Multiple Domain Hosting * Private Label Nameservers
- Next message: Trog Woolley: "Re: No Rumor: Windows Source Code Loose on the 'Net"
- Previous message: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- In reply to: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Next in thread: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Reply: Steve Schreiber: "Re: Dead brand new SCSI drive?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|