Re: Why Do Red Hat Linux (And Most Other Linuxes) Use SYSV Scripts?
From: Stephan Wonczak (wonczak_at_Uni-Koeln.DE)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: Stephane: "Re: MKISOFS"
- Previous message: users_at_linuxforums.org: "re:Ambit USB Cable Modem setup on Fedora Core 2 test 2"
- In reply to: Richard Huelbig: "Why Do Red Hat Linux (And Most Other Linuxes) Use SYSV Scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:20:01 +0200
Richard Huelbig wrote:
>
> My understanding is that most Linux distributions, including Red Hat,
> are based on BSD UNIX as opposed to SYSV UNIX. So, if this is true, then
> why do Red Hat and most other Linuxes use SYSV startup scripts instead
> of BSD startup scripts?
Well, the reason for this is that your understanding is wrong :-)
Linux is a SysV derivative and always has been. Note the lack of
directories like /ucb and stuff like that. And of course, the SysV
startup provides a massive hint!
HTH
-- C U, Stephan "I haven't lost my mind; I know exactly where I left it." "The meaning of my life is to make me crazy"
- Next message: Stephane: "Re: MKISOFS"
- Previous message: users_at_linuxforums.org: "re:Ambit USB Cable Modem setup on Fedora Core 2 test 2"
- In reply to: Richard Huelbig: "Why Do Red Hat Linux (And Most Other Linuxes) Use SYSV Scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]