Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load
From: Tommy Reynolds (TommyReynolds_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 04/28/04
- Next message: wlj_at_elmore.rr.com: "Force Password Expiration"
- Previous message: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: PATH problem..."
- In reply to: Stephan Wonczak: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Next in thread: Sander: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Reply: Sander: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:30:18 -0500
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:56:35 +0200, Stephan Wonczak wrote:
> The OP said he had a load of 4 while the CPUs being more or less idle.
> Usually this is an indication that a process is stuck in kernel space
> somewhere. This does count towards the load average while actual CPU
> consumption is zero.
I've been thinking about this. The kind of activity described by the
OP would perfectly match the situation where several processes were
waiting on a semapohre/mutex. When the semaphore was released, there
could be a wakeup sent to each of these processes, resulting in many
processes being on the run queue (and showing up as a high load
average). This could be caused by a kernel bug.
Either scenario could cause the reschedule storm that the OP sees.
This could get _very_ interesting!
Cheers!
- Next message: wlj_at_elmore.rr.com: "Force Password Expiration"
- Previous message: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: PATH problem..."
- In reply to: Stephan Wonczak: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Next in thread: Sander: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Reply: Sander: "Re: RH 8; intermittend very high load"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|