Re: Redhat Enterprise

From: red_mao (red_mao_at_email.it)
Date: 09/19/04 

Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:37:11 GMT

marcello wrote:
> I know that Redhat Enterprise Linux is commercial, but I don't understand if
> it's commercial because it included the support or because the software is
> commercial.
>
>
because it included the support. all the packages are released under the GPL

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How do I restrict access to my website - require a password etc.?
    ... I've never used the service myself, because my hosting company does ... not support this software. ... Marcello ... >membership. ...
    (microsoft.public.frontpage.programming)
  • Re: Redhat Enterprise
    ... > marcello wrote: ... >> I know that Redhat Enterprise Linux is commercial, ... > because it included the support. ... This mean that the cd of Redhat Enterprise are free and it is possible to ...
    (linux.redhat)
  • Re: Rene is a hypocrite (OK, what else is new?)
    ... the project...it's also a GPL project so, like anyone else, they must ... the project will be a neutral "Xlib support files for assembly" ... support that Guga has helped put into RosAsm - due credit, ... with the _X-Windows_ platform, which Rene has done nothing for, has ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: License issue with Fedora
    ... > the context is their refusal to provide support on a second machine. ... are covered by GPL and which therefore ... exercise of the rights granted herein. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Linux Advocates Fear Solaris 10.
    ... Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support wrote: ... > comes very close to accusing Sun of breaking the GPL. ... Well, they /were/ interested in all those nice drivers, but lost ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)