Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?
From: Lenard (lenard_at_127.0.0.1)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: olivier: "RHCT"
- Previous message: Richard L. Hamilton: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Next in thread: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Reply: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:07:04 GMT
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:39:07 -0500, Linux Lover wrote:
> Thanks Lenard, but that's exactly what I tried to avoid (see original
> post). I was thinking more in the direction of a pre-compiled
> xircom_tulip_cb.o that fits 2.4.21.4-EL. Or... some way to fool RHEL
> into accepting a perfectly good xircom_tulip_cb.o that happens to have a
> different signature.
Try this rpm package then;
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/1537828/com/kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13.i386.rpm.html
Good Luck!!
-- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
- Next message: olivier: "RHCT"
- Previous message: Richard L. Hamilton: "Re: "Torn between two OS" - Solaris vs Linux"
- In reply to: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Next in thread: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Reply: Linux Lover: "Re: xircom_tulip_cb.o for 2.4.21.4-EL ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
