Re: RPM lies about an installed package
From: Tommy Reynolds (TommyReynolds_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: Excluding packages from yum update"
- Previous message: Paul D: "Re: Excluding packages from yum update"
- In reply to: Mark Healey: "RPM lies about an installed package"
- Next in thread: Jacob: "Re: RPM lies about an installed package"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:16:05 -0600
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:45:13 +0000, Mark Healey wrote:
> As root I tried:
> []rpm -e nethack-3.4.3-1.i386.rpm
> and it responded with:
> error: package nethack-3.4.3-1.i386.rpm is not installed
Correct. You gave rpm(1) a filename, not a package name. If you had
used:
# rpm -e nethack
you'ld have removed nethack, assuming it was installed.
> Just for shits and giggles I tried:
> []rpm -Uvh nethack-3.4.3-1.i386.rpm
> and it replied with:
> package nethack-3.4.3-1 is already installed
Yup, you tried to install a package that was already installed. You
install packages using a filename -- nothing magical about the
filename.
> I then did:
> []# rpm -q -a | grep nethack
> and got:
> nethack-3.4.3-1
> What's wrong?
Well, you have nethack installed ... no productive work will ensue ;-)
- Next message: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: Excluding packages from yum update"
- Previous message: Paul D: "Re: Excluding packages from yum update"
- In reply to: Mark Healey: "RPM lies about an installed package"
- Next in thread: Jacob: "Re: RPM lies about an installed package"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]