Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?
From: R(only) B(only) Jones (R.B.Jones_at_sendmenospam.com)
Date: 05/25/05
- Next message: R(only) B(only) Jones: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Previous message: R(only) B(only) Jones: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- In reply to: Vic: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Next in thread: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:17:13 -0500
On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:49:32 +0000 (UTC), "Vic" <vic@innocent.com>
wrote:
>That's not too clear, is it?
>
>> OK - what you're telling me here is that /vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 and
>> /initrd-2.4.7-10.img are in the root directory - *not* in /boot on hda1.
>
>...By which I mean "the directory that will become /boot, but is the
>top-level directory on the hda1 partition".
>
>Hactually, that might have been clearer before...
>
I was under the impression that (at that point) that WAS the "root",
which was why it was so referenced.
- Next message: R(only) B(only) Jones: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Previous message: R(only) B(only) Jones: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- In reply to: Vic: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Next in thread: Tommy Reynolds: "Re: RH 7.2 - where's init supposed to be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]