Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)
From: P Ruetz (parmailbox-news_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/27/05
- Next message: Herbert Pophal: "Re: mozilla calendar @ FC3"
- Previous message: Lenard: "Re: Iptables not starting"
- In reply to: P Ruetz: "FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:57:45 GMT
"P Ruetz" <parmailbox-news@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cTUZe.6928$6e1.6466@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
> So my question is: Should I even bother with FC in the future or just
> stick with one of the Redhat clones (e.g. CentOS)?
>
>
Thanks to everyone who responded. It seems like a big part of which
distribution to choose is the knowledge of the installer (and maybe a bit of
luck). I am probably just not experienced/knowledgeable enough to venture
beyond the more stable releases.
Interestingly, one of the easiest distributions I tried was Knoppix 4. I'm
not sure I had a single problem with any aspect of it. But it is a bit slow
to run off the DVD/CD. Very nice to quickly try out though.
The people in this group have been instrumental in helping me through my
problems.
Thanks again,
Peter
- Next message: Herbert Pophal: "Re: mozilla calendar @ FC3"
- Previous message: Lenard: "Re: Iptables not starting"
- In reply to: P Ruetz: "FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
