Re: Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)
From: Ivan Marsh (annoyed_at_you.now)
Date: 09/29/05
- Previous message: madunix: "crontab"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Brian Brunner: "Re: Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Next in thread: P Ruetz: "Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:41:21 -0500
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:02:11 +0000, Brian Brunner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ivan Marsh wrote:
>
>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:49:33 -0400, Daniel Ganek wrote:
>>>
>>> > Ivan Marsh wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Yea... you've got the FAA... I've got the FCC.
>>> >>
>>> >> ...and like I said, I've experienced none of these issues.
>>> >>
>>> > I don't want to get into a pissing contest but I doubt that the FCC
>>> > is as strict as the FDA (Federal Drug Admin)
>>>
>>> Then don't. I'm aware of what FDA stands for. The FCC is very strict
>>> about a lot of things also. I can end up with the secret service on my
>>> doorstep just a fast as you can.
>
> How many customers and patients lawyers will be standing behind the Man
> In Black?
Johnny Cash is my friend.
> The FCC doesn't scare me half as much as the IRS, and that not half as
> much as the cadre of medical-equipment-blamed-for-mishap lawsuits.
Everyone should fear the IRS.
Isn't medical malpractice the number three cause of death in the US? I
have no doubt be beholden to the whims of the FDA is uncomfortable.
>>> But that's beside the point of the thread.
>
> agreed. we have different feels of comfort about the two styles of
> manufacture (FC v. RHEL).
RHEL's manufacturing starts with FC. Contrary to the belief of some very
vocal folks it's not a beta kludge. It's been as stable as any other
distro out there.
> Let's agree to disagree, state our cases to each new visitor, and accept
> the fact that we're not going to convert each other.
I don't think we disagree at all or require any conversion. I think we're
arguing desperate points about the same thing. The statements in this
thread that FC has something wrong with it (when compared to any other
distro) are simply incorrect.
People with bad experiences scream louder than anyone else. I personally
don't like Suse. But I'm willing to admit it's my level of experience and
comfort with Suse that's at issue, not the distro itself.
-- "Blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed." Benjamin Franklin (I didn't know he was a Buddhist)
- Previous message: madunix: "crontab"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Brian Brunner: "Re: Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Next in thread: P Ruetz: "Re: FC vs CentOS (or equiv)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
