Re: what do these names stand for
- From: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:51:39 -0500
"Tommy Reynolds" <Tommy.Reynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.30.18.45.56.975911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:01:03 +0000, Todd Knarr wrote:
>
>>> /usr
>> Nobody's sure where the "user" reference came from.
>
> Files were chosen to be placed in "/usr" iff they were needed after
> the system went multi-user.
It... gets even weirder if you look at history. Many modern systems symlink
/bin to /usr/bin. And the old "dump" and "restore" programs were stashed in
"/etc", because /etc was one of the really critical bits to run a UNIX-style
/usr was often another partition, for performance reasons and managing
backup, when backup was done with software that talked to your disk directly
like "dump" and "restore".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what do these names stand for
- From: Tommy Reynolds
- Re: what do these names stand for
- Prev by Date: Re: Installing new version of Apache on Redhat 9
- Next by Date: Re: what do these names stand for
- Previous by thread: Warm-swapping IDE drives on FC4
- Next by thread: Re: what do these names stand for
- Index(es):