Re: Sharing with workgroup



On 2006-01-08, Bill <billaboard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>> Bill wrote:
>>
>>> I've been trying to get this to work with various flavors of Linux
>>> since the beginning of 2004, so the New Year resolution is to make it
>>> work with a new machine running FC4.
>>>
>>> I have a home/small business Windows Workgroup based on a wireless
>>> router with machines that come and go. The Windows end is mainly XP,
>>> plus one W2k and some older OS's for testing software. Some desktop
>>> machines have fixed IP addresses, and the dhcp server on the router is
>>> set to provide IP's from 192.168.20 upwards.
>>> None of the Windows machines acts as the browse master, and I must
>>> keep browsing flexible ie elections and no server for the browsing lists.
>>>
>>> Early last week, I thought I had all this working, but within a few
>>> days we were getting not accessible messages in various directions.
>>>
>>> The workgroup name is set correctly everywhere, and all machines log
>>> on with the same user name and with a null samba password. (FC4 seems
>>> to require that in the initial setup, you log on with a password, but
>>> then replace it with a null - attempting to enter a null password
>>> returns a statement that the password and confirmation do not match).
>>>
>>> Pinging with IP addresses works everywhere. I just want the FC4
>>> machine to join in the elections, recognise the username and grant
>>> access.
>>>
>>> Any guidance as to where to start gratefully received!
>>>
>>> BillH
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm guessing you have their names added by smbpasswd?
>
> I believe that I have. The common username is listed as a user and I
> have now set the null password using smbpasswd -n <username>
>
>> -or-
>
>> since you're not worried about security, set;
>> [global]
>> security = share
>> [<some location>]
>> public = yes
>>
> I have added the line security = share to the global segment in smbconf
> and checked that public = yes is set in both the locations I have shared.
>
> Still no success.
>
> Running Ethereal on one of the Windows machines appears to show that
> when the Windows machine tries to make contact the Linux machine returns:
>
> Negative session response Not listening for called name
>
> The smbd and nmbd processes are running and netstat appears to show a
> TCP listen on a netbios port.
>
> Running nbtstat -c on the Windows machines seems to give the correct
> machine name for the Linux machine. nbtstat -r seems to give more
> entries for the Linux machine than any of the Win machines.
>
> How can one be sure that the name resolution is set the same at the
> Windows and Linux ends? I can see where to set it to Kerberos, LDAP or
> smb, but don't know what the normal setting should be. I also am not
> totally confident about password encryption settings between the two OS's.
>
>
>
Samba is pretty easy to setup. Could be one of many things. Check out
linuxhomenetworking.com or org and howtoforge.com. Also, in
/usr/share/doc/samba... you should have plenty of stuff to read. That'll
get you up quicker than bouncing back and forth for days here. If you
still have problems, please post back.

--
Robert

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: newb install new samba?
    ... >> about this very topic by more experienced folk, ... >> samba seems to be now available. ... local firewalls on the windows machines - I like to control exactly ... the linux machine now highlighted a problem with the ...
    (alt.os.linux.suse)
  • Re: IT time forMaintenance
    ... Desktop running Fedora Core 4 (Linux variety), and to be honest, I spend ... Ghost to do my backups on the Windows machines, and a BASH shell script to ... > the repercussions of such settings on the computers. ... How much time and how often should be allowed for maintenance. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
  • Re: Ubuntu 5.10 + How to connect to Internet
    ... I followed a few of the links, such as the one that told me the difference between a hardware modem and a software modem and how software modems were difficult to make work with Linux if possible at all. ... I ordered the Ubuntu CD's because I had read on various websites that Ubuntu was user friendly, easy to setup, great for Windows users who may want to switch over and give Linux a try, etc... ... I have used Windows machines for over 10 years and thought that I knew a little about computers, not any deep, low level knowledge, but fairly capable on a Windows machine anyway. ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)
  • Re: e-mail and web safety
    ... 3/ WIndows machines have a very limited concept of file ownership, ... Linux was written as a network aware OS from the ground up. ... The programs Dan told you about are normally enough to protect you from almost ... Should give you safe web browsing. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux big bang theory....
    ... OSX isn't using all of the tricks like windows does to try and hide ... The point is what would you rather have 1000 windows machines 1000 ... linux machines or 1000 OSX machines? ... The only reason OSX is "so good" security wise, is because the OS doesn't give ...
    (Full-Disclosure)