High availability

I am building this portal, that needs high availability and I am
thinking about clustering the 3 linux boxes to be one so if one box
goes down the other two will still keep the site up. Also I want to be
able to grow more boxes. I was also thinking too, that i will need
another server just for the db that will be running mysql.

So I guess the picture will be like 3 clustered webserver and 1or2
clustered mysql db server...

does this sound good or does anyone see any holes in this?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: High availability
    ... > thinking about clustering the 3 linux boxes to be one so if one box ... > another server just for the db that will be running mysql. ...
    (linux.redhat)
  • HA & Failover options
    ... instances for all the technology components (App Server, DB Server, ... Application Server 10g Release 3 and Oracle Database Release 2. ... Clustering features. ... how instantaneous is failover to the secondary site with data ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: 4 Queries about DB clustering
    ... Server clustering is available on Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition. ... "Single Data Store" is not a service, ... I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)
  • Re: Replication with failover clustering??
    ... We are having Merge Replication setup with push subscription. ... Microsoft SQL Server clustering is not a good fit for geospatial clustering ... Both clustering and database mirroring do do automatic failover, ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
  • Re: Choosing correct high availability setup
    ... won't be supported/allowed with Windows Server 2008 Failover Clustering. ... No matter how you do your SQL, IIS will need to know the instance name to ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering)