Re: Extremely poor performance crunching random numbers under FC5

From: bankhacker@xxxxxxxxx
Date: 19 May 2006 03:00:21 -0700

Thanks. Is reasonable that static binaries were a little faster than
dynamic ones. But in your case the difference is not as huge as in my
case: 0.4 seconds vs 43.0 seconds!

.

References:
- Extremely poor performance crunching random numbers under FC5
  - From: BankHacker
- Re: Extremely poor performance crunching random numbers under FC5
  - From: H. Pophal

Prev by Date: Re: Extremely poor performance crunching random numbers under FC5
Next by Date: Re: Is fedoraforum.org down?
Previous by thread: Re: Extremely poor performance crunching random numbers under FC5
Next by thread: HP system management homepage hpsmh on CentOS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread