Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: Ivan Marsh <annoyed@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:20:52 -0600
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:26:25 +0000, Georg Klein wrote:
Zam <NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks guys. I neglected to mention that I am configuring shorewall. IWhat's opening the ports?
SSH, POP3, RCP, IMAP and something using port 995... you should never
run without a firewall.
To use your "well-known ports" example, port 995 is pop3s (secure
pop3, much preferred from wireless hot-spots).
As root:
lsof -i :22,110,111,143,995
or
netstat -pan | egrep ":22|:110|:111|:143|:995"
had forgotten to add it to the startup scripts. When I start shorewall
all is well.
I think, in general it is not OK to have these ports open after a fresh
standard install.
Fedora/RH has always had certain services running at install... the
firewall configurator that runs at install determines whether traffic is
allowed to access them.
I think the only zero ports open default install on the market is OpenBSD
(http://www.openbsd.org/).
Though Slackware may be as secure at install.
--
I told you this was going to happen.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: Georg Klein
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: ynotssor
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- References:
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: Ivan Marsh
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: ynotssor
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- From: Georg Klein
- Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- Next by Date: redhat 6.1 dual boot
- Previous by thread: Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- Next by thread: Re: Fedora 8 ports open
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|