FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?

From: Steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:19:30 +0000

Hi,

I have a X86_64 machine. I have installed FC8. But I discovered that with Mozilla, for instance, some webs, requiered to use some plugins, like Shokewave-flash. But this extension is not available for 64bits machine....

this machine will be used for webserver, but also as desktop machine.. is this really reasonable to use a i386 version of FC8 on a 64b machine ?
Is there a real gain to use an 64b version ?

Thanks for your help
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?
  - From: Ivan Marsh

Prev by Date: Re: Solved(I think) Re: FC7->FC8 upgrade yields apache error: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:80
Next by Date: Re: FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?
Previous by thread: F6 -> F8 on cdrom system?
Next by thread: Re: FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?
... I have installed FC8. ... with Mozilla, for instance, some webs, requiered to use some plugins, ...
(linux.redhat)
Re: FC 8 choose : i386 or X86_64 ?
... I have installed FC8. ... with Mozilla, for instance, some webs, requiered to use some plugins, ... like Shokewave-flash. ...
(linux.redhat)
Re: Where is mozilla installed?
... completed but when I go back to the browser and surf a flash page it ... The stuff is put into the plugins directory under one of the mozilla. ... then there is button as "Install missing plugins". ...
(comp.os.linux.setup)
Re: FC3: Firefox 1.0 No sucess installing java plugin--> Mozilla ok, not Firefox.
... No success installing Java and Java Plugins for Mozilla, or Firefox. ...
(linux.redhat.install)
Re: Opera 6.12 bugs on FreeBSD 4.8
... In article, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: ... I need Mozilla for this and that's fine w/ me. ... Apart from that, there are a myriad of ways to rate site ``goodness'', ... leave the site unusable in the absence of said plugins. ...
(comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)