Re: NFS use

Steve wrote:
Johnny Rebel wrote:
Steve wrote:
Hi,

I don't understand one point on NFS.

I have 2 machines : A (server) B (Local machine)
In both case, I have created a user called 'user1'

I Mount the server on the local machine

local machine:
mkdir /mnt/backupuser1
chown user1 /mnt/backuser1
chgrp user1 /mnt/backuser1
chown 700 /mnt/backuser1

*On the server, I have
RW,no_root_Squash on the /home/user1

If I mount the folder :
mount 192.xxx.xx.xx:/home/user1 /mnt/backupuser1 -> fine

But any folder created on /mnt/backuser1 WILL NEVER BE FROM user1, but a
number 507 (for instance)

Why User1, who wants to write into a folder owned by user1, cannot
create files BELONGING TO user1 ????

thanks for your help

Steve

Hey,

From what I understand from what you are saying, it is probably that
user1 has a different uid/gui on each system. See your /etc/passwd and
the third/fourth fields. These should be the same. This is part of the
reason a lot of systems implementing NFS, also implement NIS!

JR.



Hi Johnny,

Thank you for your reply.
I've created another user : user2 with the same name, same password, same ID
I don't use any NIS server (I just try to inmplement it.. it doesn't
work. I will investigate)

But the only problem is that:
*Owner, group are OK
* But on the server, rights are 700
If I create a file or folder, from the local machine. it will be 744 ????

Any idea why ??

Cheers

No problems!

Hum. Can't say for sure, but check the umask of each user on each system. (type in 'umask'). That may be it. Other than that, check 'man 5 exports' for export options that may revolve around this. But, a umask of 0022 will actually give 644 for files, and 755 for directories. It does sound like your umask has been changed.

JR.


--

Bill will have to take Linux from my cold, dead flippers.

-Tux.
.

Relevant Pages

  • WebDav Permissions for Operators groups
    ... A Folder on the server is mounted as Virtual Directory, ... following NTFS permissions: ... User1 is member of the group Users ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)
  • RE: User Profiles Not Being Created
    ... On the server it shows that 'user1' had no permissions assigned to it at all, but from the client machine I can get into the folder just fine. ... > profiles using the tape backup installed on the server. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • RE: Got Postfix now what?
    ... "mail server redhat" on google should give you something. ... > remotely either over the web or through IMAP or POP3. ... imap, postfix and fetchmail. ... poll pop.yourISP protocol pop3 username "user1" password "password" is ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: [NFS] [PATCH 2/7] NFS: if ATTR_KILL_S*ID bits are set, then skip mode change
    ... how exactly is it that you have the correct creds ... user1 and user2 are both members of group ... If the server has root squashing enabled, ... In that case, user1's operations would also fail, which is even more ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Record locking...
    ... > User1 does a retrieve of information, with the intention of updating it> later. ... At the same time, User2 does a retrieve of information, with the> intention of updating it later. ... > the row on the web server, and then calls an update stored procedure. ... > We can of course add a column to every table that has to support this> "locking", but I was wondering if SQL Serversystems support some kind of ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)